Who does 3D best? Sony vs. Nintendo

Originally Posted by PirateThom

Fact is, you can't even BUY SDTVs here anymore.

so? that doesn't mean the majority of the world isn't still using them

"africa"

give me a break

not everyone owns a fucking bluray player (in fact, fuck all ppl do)

[PirateThom]

Originally Posted by Leonidas

so? that doesn't mean the majority of the world isn't still using them

"africa"

give me a break

not everyone owns a fucking bluray player (in fact, fuck all ppl do)

Probably, but, like I said, no one cares about them, since they aren't buying new TVs.

[lol_pc]

Originally Posted by Leonidas

hd is [still] not a big huge deal imo (i'm not arguing this point any further)

I know you said you didn't want to argue this any further, but every country besides 3rd world countries, HD has become the standard, if I go to my local electronics store now I garantue you every TV in that store will be either HD-Ready or Full-HD. SD is dead. Hell if you want to see the free TV channels in Denmark you gotta have a TV with MPEG4 tuner built-in and that forced a lot of people to buy HD TVs, no one wanted to buy a TV tuner to put the SD TV on life support

[dz06lt]

why is it that nintentards seem to think thant nintendo invented 3d without glasses? Samsung, Mitusbiti and Phillips showed of Glasses-less 3d TV at last years CES

Originally Posted by lol_pc

I go to my local electronics store now I garantue you every TV in that store will be either HD-Ready or Full-HD

that doesn't mean the majority of households aren't using sdtv's

at all

we're talking about two completely different things

households - not equal to - tv stores

Originally Posted by dz06lt

why is it that nintentards seem to think thant nintendo invented 3d without glasses?

name one person who thinks that

[rounds1]

It's hard to argue with Leo here (being an SDTV owner myself ). HD penetration in the US isn't even at 50% yet - I can only imagine what it is in the rest of the world. Your friends and "people you know" don't represent anywhere near close to the majority of people. Facts are facts, and the facts are in Leo's favor.

Obviously that percentage will grow until it is eventually 100%, but anyone thinking 3D is going to become huge right away is fooling themselves.

Anyhow, to the original question: Obviously Nintendo is doing it better! Glasses make me a sad panda. It seems almost like a step backwards to watch TV. Today I can sit in relative comfort, at any angle I'd like, without some stupid and bulky nonsense sitting on my face. Tomorrow I won't have any of those luxuries! 3D is fail.

Not only that, but I'd like someone to explain the difference between an HD and 3D TV? Is a 3D nothing more than an HD with 120hz input? If so, then welcome to the latest bamboozling of the consumer.

[2pro4show]

Originally Posted by Leonidas

AMERICA ISN'T THE WORLD 2PRO (i wouldn't expect you to understand this)

Originally Posted by MasterSword

I would hope he does, considering he lives in Canada /supersmile

Nice fail Leo.

[06nbarnhill]

Originally Posted by dz06lt

why is it that nintentards seem to think thant nintendo invented 3d without glasses? Samsung, Mitusbiti and Phillips showed of Glasses-less 3d TV at last years CES

Stupid post is stupid.

There is a difference between inventing it and USING it. Just like the morons who claim that Nintendo wasn't innovating when they made the Wiimote. Yes they weren't the FIRST to make the tech but they were the first to make it fun/useful.

[rounds1]

Originally Posted by 06nbarnhill

Stupid post is stupid.

they were the first to make it fun/useful.

I could argue the same!

I'm sure the motion controllers that came before the Wii-mote had some fun and useful applications. If you're going to argue anything about the Wii-mote in terms of "firsts" - it was the first to go mainstream/mass market.

[Fyrus]

This poll is similar to "who sucks the least?"

3D sucks.